Economic Order Quantity model (EOQ) and the Just-In-Time model (JIT) Essay

1.0 INTRODUCTIONIt is genuinely historic that successful enterprises study efficient extend potency wariness, curiously in manufacturing companies and retail distribution. In bloodline practice, we usu anyy use numerous trite concord stickers such as the stinting Order standard standard (EOQ) and Just-In-Time molding (JIT). The purpose of this report is to indicate the rationale of EOQ and JIT baffles and elabo vagabond to explain the effectivity in practice of the devil models. Moreover, I dogged to take the McDonald company as an example, which illust ordinate JIT model is organism use by McDonald company.In this report, by serious study and literature review, combine with refer to relevant books, search useful information from internet and my person-to-person idea. I arrest examined concepts of EOQ and JIT models. Followed by discuss the rationale of them, and illustrate effectiveness of the two models in practice that we may fully chthonicstand the grand ness of EOQ and JIT carcasss in companys daily breakgrowth. Fin meatlyy, use JIT governing body in McDonald Company is presented.2.0 THE ECONOMIC ORDER kernel of m match littley MODEL AND JUST-IN-TIME MODEL2.1 interpretation2.1.1 Economic Order sum of money modelThe Economic Order Quantity agate rip control model excessively c every last(predicate)ed the economic lot coat or economic turnout quantity, it affirms that the optimal quantity of an register feature to coif at any cadence is that quantity that minimizes total broth greets over plan period (Horne and Wachowicz 1995, p.271).2.1.2 Just-In-Time modelThe Just-In-Time be take a crap control model is an integrated bent-grass of activities designed to achieve high-volume production victimisation minimal inventories of raw physicals, act upon-in- c argon for, and perfect goods (Aquilano et al. 2004, p.426).3.0 THE BASIC ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY MODELIn 1913, F. W. Harris developed an EOQ model which has been applied widely. This model is being used in planning the purchase raw materials, and providers, and in planning purchases for wholesalers and retailers who resell products.3.1 Assumptions of EOQ ModelIt is necessary to the enumeration management that EOQ model is one of the close to viridityly approach. Use this model is relatively simple, however, according to Heizer and give (2001, p.481), it must ground on the following assumptions or conditionsRate of select is constant, cognise and independent.Lead era is certainty and constant, at that placefore, when the stock down to zero, the stock could be added at a precise time.Quantity discounts be impossible.The stock is immediate and complete.If nineed goods ar in appropriate time, shortages gouge be prevent.Setup know and prop or carrying address are pass away to variable toll.3.2 The Objective of EOQ ModelThe objective of the EOQ model is to determine the optimal quantity of account to dictate and the be st time to place the order (Dyclcman et al. 1990, p.630). In fact, the EOQ is balancing two inventory management cost carrying cost and club be. Dyclcman et al. argue (1990) Carrying costs include out-of-pocket costs such as storage, insurance, taxes and so on. Opport unit of measurementy costs is related to the cost of investing capital in inventory rather than in former(a) income-producing assets. parliamentary law costs include out-pf-pocket expenditures incurred every time an order is set, such as handling, shipping, and so on.Dyclcman et al. (1990) subscribe to a further statement Carrying costs and order costs demonstrate different cost behaviors relative to the level of inventory maintained. Carrying costs increase with the quantity of inventory maintained parliamentary law costs decrease with the quantity of inventory maintained. The much inventory kept on hand, the more storage, handling, and opposite such carrying costs are incurred. The larger the add up of i nventory, the a few(prenominal)erer number of orders needed to replenish the inventory and the low-spiriteder the amount of purchase order costs.3.3 Validity of the assumptions and model robustnessAlthough the assumption of EOQ model shows highly restrictive, one advantage of EOQ model is that it is quite robust. As mentioned onwards, in that respect are approximately assumptions leave alone be dropped, like no quantity discounts, no shortages, no uncertainty in deal and lead time. On the opposite hand, such as a constant demand rate and a constant place cost per unit, can be violated fitting closely without substantially reducing the accuracy of the solution (Martinich 1997, p. 671). When the demand face seasonal changes, model can be changed to adapt to this perspective.Martinich (1997) stated cl earlier The important feature of EOQ model is that the function of total stocking cost is categoric nearly the optimal order quantity. Estimating ordering cost per unit t ime and retentivity cost per unit time are very crucial, because they are not oft generation very accurate. Therefore, the value computed for EOQ cannot equalthe true optimal value. However, because of the matt of the total stocking cost function, even if the computed EOQ is 20%-30% different from the true optimal, the cost penalty is relatively small(Martinich 1997, p.671).Robust is defined as a model that gives satisfactory answers even with substantial variation in its parameters (Heizer and feed 2001, p.486). As we mentioned above, it is difficult to decide accurate ordering costs and prop costs for inventory management. Thus, a robust model is very well-off and some errors do not cost us very untold. This is because that the EOQ model is most convenient and it can accurately forecast demand, holding cost, and ordering cost is limited.3.4 Fixed Order Point versus Fixed Order time interval PolicyEOQ model is an approach of the fixed order point policy. agree to Ellram et al. (1998, p.128) Throughout the ordering cognitive attend to, as long as the EOQ model was identified, a fixed quantity testament be ordered every time. An order is placed when inventory on hand r distributivelyes a predetermined borderline level necessary to satisfy demand during the order cycle. An order forget be generated through the automated inventory management remains.Another rank policy is the fixed order interval method. Use this method, we may set time interval, maybe every week. Under this method, some(prenominal) projects are bought by the corresponding supplier. A weekly order may be placed to reduce ordering costs and take advantages of purchase volume discounts and freightage consolidation.4.0 JUST-IN-TIME PRODUCTION SYSTEMAs we all know, the most effective stock management approach is JIT production control governing body over the past 50 courses. The system is currently being used by many industries.4.1 JIT LogicFor the purpose of JIT system, it inte nd to use minimum inventories of raw materials, process of production, and finished goods to achieve high output. Need is based on the loticular of products actual demand, other nothing bequeath be get tod. Theoretically, if an item is sold, the market will pull a substitute in the system. This triggers an order to the factory production line, where a take iner whence pulls other unit from an upstream station in the flow to replace the unit taken (Aquilano et al. 2004, p.427). Then this upstream station pulls to further upstream and endorse to release of raw materials. To make this pull process more smoothly, JIT need high tincture in every procedure, strong supplier relationships, and a very clearly demand for the final product.4.2 Feature of JIT production systemIn JIT production system, Black et al. (1996, p.842) argue that it include three describe features1). Operation of production line is based on demand-pull, as a result, from each one workstations activity is su bject to the approval of the demand of downriver workstations. There are many approaches to use demand-pull feature, but the most common method is Kanban system which is the Japanese term for a visual establish or card.Under Kanban system, use a kanban card to operate to original another operation to produce a given part of the additional quantity. Black et al. (1996) provide an example suppose the assembly department of a muffler manufacture receives an order for 10 mufflers. The assembly department triggers productions of the 10 metal pipes it call for to make the 10 mufflers by sending a kanban card to the machining department, which then begins producing the pipes. When production is completed, the machining department usurpes the kanban card to the box containing the psychogenic pipes and ships the package downstream to the assembly department, which starts the cycle over a garner when it receives the abutting customer order.2). Each unit including the setup time and m anufacturing lead time are minimized. When a product is prepare to begin in production line, then turned into finished products, the process of the elapse of the time is known as manufacturing lead time. Production of demand normally produced relatively small quantities, however, as long as setup measure are small, it is cost-efficient to produce product in small quantities.3). If move have imperfect and insufficient, the production line will cease operation. Each staff should attach great importance to reducing the occurrence of such problems like defective material parts. Conversely, under the traditional inventory management system, workers can bring down defective parts and continue to work because the inventory parts and work in process are huge.Hirsch et al. (1989, p.746) take a similar view, they have to a fault added an important argument that total quality control (TQC) is very much combined with JIT system. All the staff have become quality control inspection person nel, meanwhile, if products and materials are found to be not watching quality standard, the production line should suspend operation. As long as this situation happened, it must be resolved as soon as possible. It government agency that workers have not impetus to ignore the fault in the early of production process stage, they had to stop their work process.4.3 JIT CostingThe fundamental variation amidst JIT method and other traditional methods is the treatment of the costs.According to Hirsch et al. (1989, p.746), under the traditional approach of costing, raw materials or reserves firstly repel into an asset account, when they are transported. After these amounts are transferred into a work-in process account, they will be put into operation as raw materials. Then, as the materials move from process to process they pass through a serial publication of work-in-process accounts for each operation. Eventually, when the productinventory through work-in-process account transfer t o finished product inventory account.With JIT the incoming materials are entered at cost flat into a material and work-in-process inventory account. There is no series of work-in-process accounts for each process because there is very little work-in-process to account for. The value of material is diverted to finished product inventory account because the product has been completed.4.4 JIT buyIn JIT buying, suppliers use the replacement principle of Kanban by employ small, standard-size containers and make some(prenominal) shipments daily to each customer. JIT not only reduces in-process inventories by using Kanban, but alike raw materials inventories are reduced by applying the same principles to suppliers as well.According to Frazier and Gaither (2001) the elements of JIT purchasing are as following1). provider development and supplier relations undergo fundamental changes. The character of the relationships amongst customers and suppliers shifts from being adversarial to be ing cooperative. The Japanese call these relationships subcontractor networks and refer to suppliers as co-producers.2). purchasing departments develop long-term relationships with suppliers. The result is long-term grant contracts with a few suppliers rather than short-term supply contracts with many suppliers.3). Although price is very important, voice communication schedules, product quality, and mutual cuss and cooperation become the primary basis of supplier selection.4). Suppliers are encouraged to extend JIT approach to their own suppliers.5). Suppliers are commonly located near the buying firms factory, or if they are some distance from the factory, they are often clustered together. This causes lead times to be shorter and more reliable.6). Shipments are delivered to the customers production line directly. Because suppliers are encouraged to produce and supply parts at a steady rate that matches the use rate of the buying firm, company-owned hauling equipment tends to be preferred.7). Parts are delivered in small, standard-size containers with a minimum of paperwork and in exact quantities.8). Delivered material is of near-perfect quality. Because suppliers have a long-term relationship with the buying firms and because parts are delivered in small lot sizes, the quality of purchased materials tends to be high.5.0 THE military strength OF EOQ MODEL IN PRACTICE5.1 Examination of EOQ AssumptionsIn the practice of line of merchandise arena, although EOQ model enable to generate many good results, many limitations of EOQ model is combined with its own assumptions. Schroeder (1993, p.592) argued as following1). In practice, demand is off-key to be constant, but in many cases demand is shifty.2). The unit cost is assumed constant, in practice, however, normally if the purchase of large quantities, it will gain quantities discounts. This case needs a modification of the basic EOQ model and is tough in the chapter supplement.3). The material in the l ot is assumed to arrive all at once, but in some cases material will be placed in inventory unceasingly as it is produced. This case is also treated in the supplement.4). A single product is assumed, however, sometimes several projects were purchased through a single provider. Meanwhile they are being shipped at one time.5). state the setup cost is static, as a military issue of fact, it is always decreased.These assumptions have been pointed out to illustrate the limitation of the basic EOQ model, barely it is useful approximation in practice. The formula at least puts you in the ballpark, provided the assumptions are reasonably accurate. In addition, the total-cost curve is rather flat in the region of the minimum. Therefore the EOQ can be adjusted moderately to conform to reality without greatly affecting the costs.The EOQ formula can also offer insight into economic behavior of inventories. For example, traditional upset arguments enkindle that inventory should increase d irectly with gross revenue if a constant turnover ratio is desired. Since turnover is the ratio of gross sales to inventory, a doubling of sales will allow a doubling of inventory if the turnover rate is held constant. But the EOQ formula suggests that inventory should increase only with the square result of sales. This indicates that it is net economical to maintain a constant turnover ratio as sales increase a higher turnover is indeed justified.It is important for financial manager that fully understand limitations and assumptions of the EOQ model will offer a strong base of making stock management decision.5.2 EOQ Model ExtensionObviously, through the above discussion, some assumptions of EOQ model are impractical. In order to make this model more useful, it is necessary to annexe for EOQ model. Besley and Brigham (2005, pp.602-603) state clearlyTo begin with, if there is a delay between the time inventory is ordered andwhen it is received, the company have to reorder ahead it use up inventory. To avoid this, the firm can carry safeguard stock, which means additional inventory carried to guard against unanticipated changes in sales rates or production/shipping delays.The amount of safety stock a company holds generally increase with a) the uncertainty of demand forecasts, b) the costs (in term of lost sales and lost goodwill) that result from stockouts, and c) the materialises that delay will occur in receiving shipments. The amounts of safety stock decreases as the cost of carrying this additional inventory increase. Moreover, a company should consider when determining appropriate inventory level is whether its supplier provides discounts to purchase large quantities.It is unrealistic to suppose that the demand for the inventory is uniform in the year, theEOQ model should not be based on an annual to applying. More appropriate approach should divide the year into the seasons like the spring, the summer, the fall, and the winter which sales are rel atively constant then the EOQ model can be applied separately to each periods.6.0 THE strong suit OF JIT IN PRACTICEIn practice, we have already found that JIT system have its potential benefits and its problems. It is important to use that fully comprehension the merits and the problems of JIT system.6.1 natural Benefits of JITMeredith and Shafer (2002, p.351) deem that JIT provide various advantage in real operationCost savings. There are many approaches to save cost. Such as inventory reduction, reduced scrap, fewer defect, less space, fewer changes due to twain customers and engineering, decreased labor hours, less rework, reduced rework, and other such effects. sum total savings range in the neighborhood of20 to 25 percent, with importantly higher savings on individual categories such as inventory and defects.Revenue increases. Through high-quality product and satisfactory proceeds to customers, revenue will be increase. Short lead time and speedyly reply to meet customers need lead to wear out margins and higher sales. The rapid research and development of new products and divine service will bring more revenues.Investment savings. Investment is saved through three primary effects. commencement exercise, less space is needed for the same qualification. Second, inventory is reduced to the point that turns extend about 50 to 100 a year. Third, the volume of work produced in the same facility is significantly increased, frequently by as much as 100 percent.Workforce improvement. JIT companys employees are more satisfied with their work. They prefer the teamwork it demands, and they like the fact the fewer problems arise. They are also better trained for the flexibility and skills needed with JIT, and they enjoy the growth they figure in their jobs. All this translates into better, more productive work.Uncovering problems. One of the unexpected benefits is the greater visibility to problems that JIT allows, if management is willing to capitalize o n the chance to fix these problems. In trying to speed up a process, all types of difficulties are uncovered and most of them are various from of waste so not only is response time but also is ordinarily zero.6.2 Potential Problems in Implementing JITIt is important that JIT system has some problems and limitations. According to Meredith and Shafer (2002, p.353), there are some difficulties and problems as followingFirst of all, JIT system is do for repetitive production case, including relatively standard products. It does not applicable to custom, continuousflow, or project situation. JIT system is not long-term operations, because it is based on the identical mixed-model plans to operation in every day. Clearly, when setups need to spend a long time, JIT will not able to run continuously. JIT system often has setups, it also has frequent shipments and receipts. Therefore the company must be lively for this too.JIT need principle as well. Production will cease, once products are not arrive on schedule, or flaws happen. Moreover, we have no other means or time to make up for mistakes. Production system must be used correctly, workers must fulfill their work seriously, otherwise run of JIT system will fail.Principle is usually linked with supply chain. The biggest problem to successful operation of JIT system is unrealistic deliveries from suppliers. For example Suppose X companys two important suppliers have already gone strike for several days, X company was forced to confining 10 of its plants at a cost of almost $500 one thousand thousand in lost profits. When an important supplier their supply, JIT is very danger if there is no backup supplier.In addition, equally serious problem is when a comprehensive delivery service goes on strike, like UPS and FEDEX strike that idled thousands of business and caused a major disruption in the economy. Although other delivery service can sometimes fill in, they often cannot bring sufficient capacity to the problem t o keep JIT operating without disruption.On the other hand, JIT is based on cooperation and trust among workers, managers, suppliers, customers, and so on. The current environment must be trust and competition is not exist, or else JIT will not run successfully. confide and cooperation must also be extended to the external such as suppliers and customers. With suppliers, this means moving to risky, single-source contracts and bringing an outsider into the project team, where there may be proprietary secrets.6.3 E-Commerce and JIT PurchasingNowadays, JIT system combined with e-commerce, making the JIT purchasing hasbecome better to use in practice. E-commerce has already put up a advantage to JIT purchasing. There are some merits being showed stamp down waste of time to deal with paper work and reduce the procurance lead time labor costs are also reduced. The keister line is a more efficient and effective purchasing process (Frazier and Gaither 2001, p.477).E-commerce can drive th e use of Kanban between manufacturer and suppliers. Under method of Internet-based system, a manufacturer can electronically send Kanban to suppliers. E-Kanban and paper Kanban have identical functions, however they can provided to suppliers rapidly.7.0 JIT SYSTEM IN MCDONALD COMPANYWhat are the benefits for McDonald?The major benefits for McDonald are better food at a freeze off cost. McDonald Company has found something that allows them to improve quality and subvert costs.Improved musical noteThe less obvious benefit is the higher quality customer service that arises from the JIT burger assembly. When McDonald waits for you to order the burger, they do a few things to improve customer service. First of all, when you place a special order, it does not send McDonalds into a panic that causes huge delays.Now that McDonald company is in the practice of delay until you order a burger until they make it, they dont freak out when they have to make a special order fresh just for you. This higher quality customer service is subject to McDonald ability to produce faster. Without this ability, McDonalds ordering costs would be sky-high because the costs associated with ordering would be the loss of customers tired of ordering fast food that real isnt fast.Second, JIT allows McDonald to adapt to demand a little bit better. Seemingly, lower inventory levels would cause McDonalds bigger problems in a higher demand because they wouldnt have their safety stock. However, because they can produce burgers in a record time, they dont have to worry about their pre-made burger inventories running out in the middle of an exceptionally busy shift. pooh-pooh Costs In McDonald, the holding costs for burger parts (beef, cheese, whatever other garbage they put on their burgers) are fairly high because of their spoiling costs. Frozen ground beef thats good today strength not be so good in a few months. Once cooked, the same ground beefs spoilage rate shoots through the roof. Ins tead of having a shelf life of months or weeks, the burger needs to be sold within 15 minutes or so. The holding costs go from roughly 20% per week to 100% per hour. wherefore use JIT?According to argument of inscription management review (2005)Economic Order Quantity Savings A large benefit of JIT is that it reduces the total cost of ordering and holding inventory. High holding costs is the nature of the fast food industry. JIT system allowed them to exploit the savings that were realized by holding less inventory.High holding costs and low ordering costs are the factors that drive JIT. Generally, its the ability to lower ordering costs that make it a feasible solution. McDonald was slave to the high holding costs. It was just the nature of their industry. The solution for them was that while they couldnt lower holding costs, they could lower ordering costs.EOQ determines how much you should order and there are two factors that drive economic order quantities down low ordering cos ts and high holding costs. Depending on the product and the industry, one or twain of these qualities may exist in your operations. If they do, JIT may be right for you. Without the ability to make ordering costs low as a division of holding costs,then there is no need for JIT. In fact, the increased frequency in ordering will result in cost increases.Safety Stock ReductionsThe other aspect of JIT is the drastic reduction in safety stock. Two reasons result in safety stock exist variability in demand and variability in lead times from suppliers (for McDonald company, the supplier is the internal production process). If lead time is shorter, which JIT tries to accomplish, then this part of the safety stock is smaller, this lowering safety stock inventory. McDonald company is consummate this by creating a system that allowed a faster burger production (McDonalds lead times are internal).On the other hand, If lead time has no variance or is reduced, then this term can be eliminated or at least reduced. Again, this is what JIT try to accomplish. McDonald company is accomplished by standardizing production.McDonald Company fully understand that a considerable amount of work needs to be done with suppliers/internal operations in order to accomplish the tasks of shortening lead times and reducing their variances. McDonald company has the imagination to implement JIT system successfully.However, in competitive industries, JIT is not optimal for all the firms. JIT, like most management accounting techniques, is not a customary panacea, and some firms find it profitable like McDonald, Walmart, and so on some are not.8.0 CONCLUSIONIt should be said that stock management is openhanded aspect of working capital management. For the purpose of control stock level, most of companies use EOQ and JIT models in practice. Efficiency gains in inventory management can bring significant improvement to overall company financial performance. However, no model has been fully satis factory. The two models have advantages and disadvantages respectively. In general, although eachmodel will work well in certain environments, they may not work well in other environments. An inappropriate choice of system can be expensive mistake. Thus, it can be concluded that each company should choose own different stock control model with its own conditions and efficient inventory management can lead to better planning and business control.LIST OF REFERENCEEric Smith, Joseph G. Louderback III, and Maurice. Hirsch 1989, _Cost method of accounting in Australia Accumulation, Analysis, and Use_, create by Thomas Nelson, p.746.Richard B. Chase, F. Robert Jacobs, and Nicholas J. Aquilano 2004, _Operations Management for Competitive Advantage_, 10th edn., McGraw-Hill publish Company, pp.426-427.Jay Heizer and Barry construe 2001, _Operations Management_, Prentice-Hall Inc. New Jersey, pp.481-486.Joseph S. Martinich 1997, _Production and Operations Management An Applied Modern Appr oach_, John Wiley & Sons Inc., p. 671.Lisa M Ellram, Douglas M. Lambert, and James R. Hock 1998, _Fundamental of Logistics Management_, Irwin/McGraw-Hill create Company, p. 128.Charles T. H Orngren, George Foster, Srikant M. Datar, Terry Black, and Phil Gray 1996, _Cost Accounting in Australia A Managerial Emphasis_, Prentice Hall Australia Pty Ltd., p. 842.James C. train Horne and John M. Wachowicz Jr. 1995, _Fundamental of Financial Management_, Prentice-Hall International Inc., p. 271.Roger G. Schroeder 1993, _Operations Management Decision qualification in the Operations Function_, 4th edn., McGraw-Hill International Inc., p. 592.Scott Besley and Eugene F. Brigham 2005, _Essentials of Managerial Finance_, 13th edn., South-Western Thomson Publishing Company, pp. 602-603.Jack R. Meredith and Scote M Shafer 2002, _Operations Management for MBAs_, John Willey & Sons Inc., pp.351-353.Greg Frazier and Norman Gaither 2001, _Operations Management_, 9th edn., South-Western Publishing Company, pp.476-477.Inventory Management Review 2005, viewed 5 June 2007, .Thomas R. Dyclcman, Harold Bierman, and Reonald W. Hilton 1990, _Cost Accounting Concepts and Managerial Application_, Pws-Kent Publishing Company, pp. 630-631.