'American Presidents - The Best and Worst'

' equate and contrast the municipal and unlike constitution goals during the reign of deuce American hot seats (1920-2008). Which president was more lucky in obtaining their particular(prenominal) national and foreign policy goals? why? Provide unique(predicate) historical examples.\n\njoined States had its avow sh ar of untroubled and bad presidents. Presidents that make a immut equal to(p) impression on a invoice and presidents that should have never made the history. It would be an easy project to compare unmatched of the most undefeated presidents to one of the conquer presidents in the in the block up century, but that would non be much(prenominal) of an argument. Instead, I refractory to compare successes and failures of dickens presidents that in my look were remarkable to each one in his take way: load Clinton and Ronald Reagan. In my opinion, Reagan wins in the department of foreign affairs. He was able to put a final end to Cold War. Clinton, on the other hand, was answerable for creating the biggest surplus in the history of the unite States.\nRight from the start, these deuce presidents had different agendas in mind when it came to presidency. Clinton cherished to sharpen his efforts on domestic issues, epoch Reagan was more evoke in restoring coupled States image as a superpower. He believed that The Soviet marriage underlies all the fermenting in the populace (U.S. Narrative History, p. 670). When Reagan took magnate in 1981, he wanted to concentrate his efforts on supply-side political economy to fix the crumbling economy. He proposed a 30% rate diminution plan in corporate as well as individual levyes and relation back ended up approving 25%. This strategy backfired on him, as critics afterward accused him that the value cuts were implemented to acquire the wealthy. Reagan hoped that people in the highest tax brackets are more in all probability to use the tax break and deck in the crumbling economy . Reagans administration too made real cuts in domestic spending. This decision negatively affected the poorest o...'